Archive for September, 2012

Reflections On A Month With The Leica Monochrom

Posted in Uncategorized with tags , , , , on September 27, 2012 by johnbuckley100

All photos Leica Monochrom and Noctilux f/0.95, except where noted.  Click on photos for a clearer view.

It is, of course, some kind of post-modern irony that with the release of Leica’s digital M Monochrom, which offers stunningly powerful technology yet takes only black and white photos, we rediscovered the timelessness of monochrome photography.  Yes, there are aficionados who never stopped taking pictures with silver halide film, and yes, since the earliest days of digital, there have been straightforward software solutions enabling color images to be transformed, as it turns out, back to the black and white images that are first captured by the camera’s sensor.  But as we have used it over the past 30 days, Leica’s Monochrom, which captures data as black and white and then, in a somewhat revolutionary move, stops there, not subjecting the image to a color filter, has been for us a revelation.

Photographers who embrace Leica cameras and lenses, particularly in the digital age when Canon and Nikon offer high-end devices with a plethora of options for the operator to consider, tend to favor fairly radical simplification.  After all, to use an M, even a digital M, means turning one’s back on things like spot metering and automatic focus — things most modern photographers take so for granted, they can’t imagine what kind of retrograde personality would do without them.  And yet here is Leica removing the option even to capture an image in color.  But as we have learned over the past month, there are many benefits to this approach.  To begin with, the image below was taken well after sunset, at ISO 5000 — a setting commonplace for use by DSLR photographers, but not by rangefinder photographers who use Leica’s legendary lenses.

Leica Monochrom, 35mm Summilux FLE, f/8, 1/500th.

Over a decade of shooting with Leica rangefinders — first film, and later the digital M8 and M9 — many of the essential elements of photography we learned as a kid came back to us.  However, it must be said that with our M7, we shot black and white film sparingly, and with the M8 and M9, seldom converted digital images to black and white, because we so loved the highly saturated color that we saw in Fuji Velvia transparencies or what showed up in Lightroom.  Being forced to think in black and white, viewing things in luminance, not chroma, has been an adjustment, a revelation, and a delight.  Did we need to use a monochrome-only camera to achieve this?  No, of course not.  But the binary system has forced us to take our Monochrom into situations we previously would have “seen” in color and forced us to see them anew — and in more classical terms.

Leica Monochrom and 35mm Summilux FLE

The grip of color is too powerful to give up, and even after we had our Monochrom for a week or so, when the opportunity presented itself, on a beautiful sunny day, to wander around the city taking pictures, of course we took our M9 — it was a cloudless day, the sky was blue, and we realized that we think of black and white more for when the light is dimmer, the sky is grayer.  (When we think of the thousands of black and white pictures taken by our favorite photographers, they always seem to have been taken on days with imperfect light — imperfect for a color photographer who needs bright light to get the saturated colors he loves.)  The warning that blown highlights with the Monochrom cannot be recovered, because nothing is hiding in one of the color channels, hasn’t really affected us so far — and blown highlights, in which the sky shows up as white, looks pretty much the way they always have in black and white photography.  But even now, we find ourself giving into our instinct, when wandering out into the street on a bright and sunny day, to leave the Monochrom behind and shoot in color.  After all, one can always convert to black and white in post-processing, right?

The possibilities inherent in the Monochrom and its sensor, in softer light, has consistently blown our mind.  Consistently, we’ve gone out to take pictures and been transported into a prior time — not just the black and white film-wielding days of our youth, but something that we are not too self-conscious to say reminds us of some prior age of classic photography.

A picture we might well have previously taken with our M9 has emerged from the Monochrom looking, well, different.  Maybe everything we’ve learned over the past decade is paying off; it obviously can’t just be the equipment.  After all, cameras are just a tool, right? But we can’t help but think that the Monochrom is a special tool — a deliberately limiting mechanism that paradoxically opens up new horizons along classical lines.  When William Eggleston and Stephen Shore and others shook the art world by its lapels and demanded that color photography be taken seriously, something important happened.  But this back-to-the-future approach of using cutting edge technology to render something timeless is strangely liberating.  Skeptics will say, Yeah, there’s nothing here that couldn’t be captured by an M9, or any other camera, and be coaxed out through software.  And our reply is, Yes, but we never would have explored those possibilities before the Monochrom.  If the best camera is the one you have with you, as the saying goes, the corollary is that the best way of seeing may be the one that reflects the tool you have to use.

Yes, of an evening, we would have wandered Northwest Washington D.C.’s gardens and urban oases with our M9, and come back with some lovely images, because how could you not, given the gorgeous material?  Yet we doubt we would have thought of what magic could occur, after sunset, when the light was “bad.”  The range of the camera is extraordinary — and we have barely scratched the surface of what it can do.  We’ve barely used it at high ISOs, we haven’t deliberately taken it into impossibly dark situations, we’ve shot most of the images we’ve taken with it at ISO 640 or below.  And yet we find ourselves gravitating to an approach that is at odds with the capabilities most celebrated, and used this simplifying camera in a simplified form: low ISO, but mostly shot with fast glass wide open.

Not just because it takes color images, we view our M9 as our main camera, and the Monochrom as a specialty tool.  But just as all photographers, learning and trying to improve their craft, seek to find an identity that is their own — a style that has some consistency, and isn’t simply a grab bag of opportunistic snapshots — we are fully willing to accept a split personality.  The Monochrom will operate in one universe, the M9, or someday, the M, in another.  We sit here, having had the Monochrom for just a month, marveling at the worlds it has opened up.

Bicycle Dreams

Posted in Uncategorized with tags , on September 24, 2012 by johnbuckley100

Leica M9, 35mm Summilux FLE, ND filter.

The Uncut Music Award 2012 Longlist

Posted in Music with tags on September 24, 2012 by johnbuckley100

Every year around this time, Uncut Magazine lists the albums in consideration for their Music Awards, the shortlist of which is announced usually around mid-November.  It’s an odd approach, dictated by the necessities of long-lead magazine publishing, because they turn what in essence is their Top 10 list of music from a given year to a cohort culled from a September to September calendar.  Thus, for example, Wilco’s The Whole Love is cited on the 2012 Longlist, even though to our linear, Western-calendar mind, that album isn’t in consideration, because it came out a year ago.

What is oddest about their list this year is how so much of Calendar Year 2012’s best music isn’t on it.  Okay, they have Ty Segall and White Fence’s Hair, which Tulip Frenzy readers should know right now is going to loom large in our Top Ten list, published in time for Christmas shopping.  But where is Spiritualized?  Cat Power?  Patti Smith?  We appreciate seeing Dr. John on the list, but we wonder: with Laura Marling, Dexy’s, and Richard Hawley on the list, is this going to be another one of those years when they try selling us the hooey that Portishead or Joanna Newsom deserve such honors?

Ice Cream Man

Posted in Uncategorized with tags , on September 21, 2012 by johnbuckley100

Leica M9, 35mm Summilux FLE, 2 Stop ND Filter

You Lookin’ At Me?

Posted in Uncategorized with tags , on September 18, 2012 by johnbuckley100

Leica M9, 35mm Summilux FLE, 2X ND filter.

Which Direction?

Posted in Uncategorized with tags , on September 17, 2012 by johnbuckley100

Lafayette Park, Washington, D.C., moments after the President’s helicopter has landed on the White House lawn.  Leica M9, 35mm Summilux FLE, ND filter.

Calexico’s “Algiers” Was Actually Last Week’s Best Album Release

Posted in Music with tags , , , on September 17, 2012 by johnbuckley100

Bob Dylan’s Tempest garnered all the acclaim, but the music we’ve been listening to most in Tulip Frenzy World HQ is Calexico’s Algiers.  It’s not that we don’t want to listen to 14-minute songs about the Titanic (and 40-minutes or so of the Bobster’s album is a superb return to the prior form that Together Through Life suggested had been reduced to bar-band renderings of boozy blues.)  It is that one of America’s great bands has produced a career highlight album filled with gorgeous melodies and thrilling beats we cannot for the life of us get out of our head.

The story of Bob Dylan and Calexico can maybe framed as the rivalry between America’s two great rivers.  The Mississippi is both lubricant and muse, Ole Man River.  But the Colorado — which (before Lake Powell and Lake Mead stole its bounty for thirsty Western cities and greedy farmers) at least used to empty silted runoff from the Rockies via a Mexican terminus — forms an almost entirely separate second musical delta.  Having been raised near its source, the septuagenarian Dylan might still be working the loamy riverbank of the Mississippi, but the Southwestern-based Calexico instead has worked the parched seams of the Colorado, which just happens to be America’s greatest artist. (Editor: huh?  Reply: Compare how the Grand Canyon is sculpted to anything produced by Winslow Homer or Jackson Pollack, and you’ll see why we accord it that status.)  As between Tabasco and Salsa, America is one big tasty musical treat, but it’s only when you think about the grand tradition of our nation West of the Mississippi that Calexico’s Mexicali-tinged rock’n’roll music begins to claim its place.  The Mississippi, with its blues and jazz and the gumbo and chitlin’ stewpot that cooked up rock’n’roll is where we’ve been; the Mariachi and Spaghetti Western fuzz-guitar twang that inspired Joey Burns and John Convertino may actually be where we’re going.

Yet Algiers wasn’t recorded, as you might have expected, in the roiling sandstorm of North Africa, but the Louisiana precinct of the same name.  And how does humidity leaven the Tucson-based band’s first album since the brilliant Carried To Dust from 2008?  It actually doesn’t seem to have affected it much at all.  Algiers may be the most radio friendly Calexico album to date, but it is still filled with enough slickrock mystery to animate a B. Traven novel, with all the humanity, though a lower body count, of something by Cormac McCarthy.  The latter may have migrated, like so many others, from Appalachia to the Deep South to the Southwest Desert, the reverse route of Calexico on at least this album, but he always maintains an essential American talent for mayhem, and so do Calexico, as American as pico de gallo.

Algiers is what’s been flowing through our ear buds, flowing with maybe just a bit more volume due to the heavier rainfall to be found east of the 100th Meridien.  It’s good to have Calexico back, with their rocking American folk songs that flow from an alternative American tradition.

All The World’s A Stage

Posted in Uncategorized with tags , on September 13, 2012 by johnbuckley100

We were in The Bishop’s Garden at the National Cathedral.  A nice family was there with a photographer and their cute toddler.  While the photographer chimped, the little girl, unconstrained, made use of the space available to her.  Leica Monochrom, Noctilux, ISO 320, about a half hour after sunset. Click on image to see it at a better resolution.

Interesting Interview With Jim Reid Of Jesus and Mary Chain

Posted in Music with tags on September 11, 2012 by johnbuckley100

This morning brings us an interesting interview with Jim Reid.  Link to the piece, but here are some elements that intrigued, especially in light of what we’d written yesterday about their show at 930:

Punk rock didn’t have the melody you were going after?
The Ramones were a huge influence. We just thought, “How far can you take it with the noise aspect?” The blueprint was The Velvet Underground. On the same album, you can have “I’ll Be Your Mirror” and “Waiting for the Man” and “Venus in Furs” and I thought that was fabulous. We thought, “How far can you push that?” We wanted a Shangri-Las song if it were backed up by Einstürzende Neubauten.

(We’d written:  “Occasionally the glorious mix of the Ramones meeting Lou Reed in the Brill Building basement shone through, and yeah, those hits fromAutomatic and Honey’s Dead were a sound for sore ears. What started out as a noise rock band was transformed along the way into the greatest exemplars of the Velvet Underground who ever got radio play, but it was hard to hear the Velvets influence last night underneath the din, and this is not simply because we are old as the band is.”  Close to how Jim described their own sound, though we didn’t have the Krautrock reference.)

On Jim Reid and sobriety:

Have you stopped using drugs?
Is Jack Daniels a drug? I gave up drinking for five and one-half years. I fell off the wagon about a year and a half ago. I occasionally dabble with drugs. I drink a lot. It’s my poison at the moment. Whatever gets you through the night.

Jesus And Mary Chain At 930 Club Come On Like A Heart Attack

Posted in Music with tags , on September 10, 2012 by johnbuckley100

iPhone 4S

The Jesus And Mary Chain returned to D.C. for the first time in years and tuned up the amps for their show at FedEx Field.  Unfortunately, they were playing at the 930 Club.  Maybe they remembered that show from 1993 when, even before the 930 Club moved from its F Street locale to its current digs on V Street, the Chain played with Mazzy Star in this very building, which at that point had holes in the roof.  Maybe they were hoping that they could be heard at the International Space Station.  All we know is that a show that included many of their best songs from that string of great albums that started with Darklands and sadly ended, in 1998, with the under-appreciated Munki, was marred by sound problems not simply generated by the volume dials being turned past Spinal Tap’s 11.  Occasionally the glorious mix of the Ramones meeting Lou Reed in the Brill Building basement shone through, and yeah, those hits from Automatic and Honey’s Dead were a sound for sore ears. What started out as a noise rock band was transformed along the way into the greatest exemplars of the Velvet Underground who ever got radio play, but it was hard to hear the Velvets influence last night underneath the din, and this is not simply because we are old as the band is.  Jim Reid seemed healthy and happy, which was a delight to see.  William seemed slightly bewildered that the subtleties of his guitar playing got electrocuted somewhere between the strum and squall.  They had a superb drummer who could have been heard at the Space Station without benefit of amplification.  But to these ears, or what’s left of them after last night, what was the most anticipated return by one of our favorite bands was blown away by the megatonnage of nuclear overkill, which really is too bad.

%d bloggers like this: