So close, and so far, from the D.C. neighborhoods P.J. Harvey captures in The Hope Six Demonstration Project, a man walks on the overpass between buildings in D.C.’s Emerald City-like City Centre. Leica M, 35mm Summilux FLE.
So close, and so far, from the D.C. neighborhoods P.J. Harvey captures in The Hope Six Demonstration Project, a man walks on the overpass between buildings in D.C.’s Emerald City-like City Centre. Leica M, 35mm Summilux FLE.
What follows is not scientific. One image (taken with the Leica Monochrom) comes from a cloudy day, and was shot at ISO 800. The other image (taken with the Leica M-240) was taken on a sunnier day, at ISO 640. Each was taken with the 50mm APO-Summicron-Asph at f/8, Monochrom at 1/125th, and the M at 1/500th. Both were processed in LR4, and then sent over to Nik Silver Efex Pro2, where we toyed with them in the High Structure preset. So, similar settings, similar post-production, not quite identical. My reason for this experiment was to determine whether or not the M-240 takes images that can compete with the Monochrom’s, when converted to black and white. Here are the two shots; look at them carefully, and after which I’ll weigh in. Admittedly, you are seeing these in a significantly down-rezzed file so they could be posted online. As always, click on the image to see them at a better resolution.
M-240:
Monochrom:
So, same lens, slightly different light conditions. One image in its native monochrome, the second image converted to black and white.
My conclusion? I think the M-240 black and white rendering is quite good, and I would not hesitate, after taking a picture, converting the image to black and white. But I also think the Monochrom image is just that much better — a little more detail in the grays, a little richer. So, which is better? I think the Monochrom. Is the M-240 black and white rendering good enough to use and be happy with? I think so.
What do you think?